How quickly kids grow up…. and change gender.

With fifty new gender options, it’s enough to cause gender confusion! Under new pronoun rules there are so many “do’s and dont’s” you need a glossary of terms just to keep up. As gender identity laws outpace same-sex marriage laws, they nullify them in the process. Forget women’s rights in a world where there is no gender.Gender Identity embodies the “it” generation.

Image by Angela Yuriko Smith from Pixabay

Today, by government decree, a child’s gender identity affords the same protection as race, ethnicity, disability, or sexual orientation as part of the human right’s code.

In Ontario Canada, a child’s choice to ‘identify’ has upstaged the rights of parents.  In June of 2017, the Canadian legislature passed the Children, Youth and Families Act which repealed and replaced the Child and Family Services Act to make room for gender identity under the foster care and adoption system across Ontario.

The Act adds “gender identity” and “gender expression” as factors that will be taken into account when deciding what is “in the best interests of the child” and enables government to seize children from parents opposing gender transition. 

It suggests that parents who steer their child towards the gender of his birth could be accused of abusing the rights of the child. Parents can only direct the child’s education and upbringing “in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.” But that’s not all.

The law challenges freedom of religion.  The only religion recognized by the state in “the best interests of the child” is the one the child himself professes to believe. Under a “no-lying” policy, children can be removed if the parents refuse to tell their kids that the Easter Bunny is real.

Canadian Minister of Children and Youth Services, Michael Coteau, declared that a parent’s failure to recognize and support a child’s gender self-identification is a form of child abuse. What does this mean for the rest of the world?

Image by Peggy und Marco Lachmann-Anke from Pixabay

In the United States, from California to Minnesota to the Washington DC, gender blending has infiltrated kindergarten classrooms as teachers celebrate gender dysphoria.

Gender Dysforia: included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5), defined as the distress experienced by a person when the sex and gender does not match the person’s gender identify. As many as 98 percent of boys and 88 percent of girls will “grow out of” their gender dysphoria and accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

In Delaware, a proposed law would allow students as young as five years to chose their own race and gender without approval from their parents.

In Oregon, 15-year olds are allowed to get a state-subsidized sex change operation without parental consent.

In Northern Virginia, a school-wide assembly featured a transgender crusader, whose message was “gender is a spectrum” and is “assigned at birth” by people who might get it wrong.

In Victoria Australia, school support plans order schools to work with transitioning children. Government policy reads: “There may be circumstances in which students wish or need to undertake gender transition without the consent of their parent/s (or carer/s), and/or without consulting medical practitioners … it will be necessary for the school to consider whether the student is a mature minor.”

An Evangelical church in Sweden will begin to use gender-neutral language.

The Trans Narrative

The new phenomenon of “rapid onset” gender dysphoria in teen girls is being medicalized and publicized as a “social contagion” similar to anorexia.

At the same time schools teach that sex change operations are “perfectly normal.” The contradiction is enough to confuse everyone. The transgender movement is moving faster than kids can spell transgender. As parents watch their rights dissolve, they are asking questions:

  • How often do five-year olds who wish to change their gender change their minds before they turn six?
  • By what authority does state ideology usurp parental autonomy?
  • How can children make decisions about sex change operations when they are too young to consent?
  • How does the transgender community respond to the idea that they are glorifying the mental health condition known as gender dysphoria?”
  • Where is the medical or psychological test to show young children will continue their gender dysphoria as young adults, well after their biology has been changed?
  • Is the trans agenda being pushed onto children for a larger agenda?

Children suffering from gender-confusion deserve compassion, not indoctrination, chemical castration, and irreversible surgery. They deserve a chance to understand their confusion, if it is truly confusion, until they are old enough to make an informed-choice, and then they deserve support for their choices… from parents, not the state.

When legislation is being framed “in the best interests of the child” it is coming from model language constructed from an international treaty called the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) which has Marxist aims in transferring power from the family to the State.

Based on the UNCRC language, the State of California passed the Bill of Rights for Children and Youth in California (SB-18) that seeks to usurp the natural rights of parents as caregivers. California is also the first state to pass mandatory school vaccination programs and introduce gender-neutral birth certificates. Taken together, these laws not only push a transgender agenda but also allow the State to parent children. California is a beta-test in America.

As California goes, so goes the nation.

Redefining Human

Russian drag queen

If the State is leading the transgender agenda then the movement has deeper implications.  Under the law, the transgender agenda seeks to redefine everyone to erase gender distinctions. 

The law would legally re-define what it means to be human as neither male nor female. The “it” generation changes an individual’s self-concept.

Shifts in language cause shifts in thought.  This conversion is purposeful in neutering the divine male and divine female both literally and figuratively. It will inevitably dissolve the family structure and make it impossible for people to conceive children. T

he movement is about totalitarian control, not rights. We are duped into believing that “group rights” are inherent rights. Move over “equal rights” to make room for “gender non-conforming” rights.

If you agree to state definitions, legalease, then there is no room for interpretation. We live an illusion of freedom where people equals property. If people do not follow the pronoun protocol under new laws then free expression becomes hate speech and censorship follows. 

Under the guise of “rights,” the transgender movement serves as convenient cover for concentrating power. The fragmentation of the sexes allows government to further separate parents from their children and everyone loses.

In our disconnection, we trade our humanity to become commodities. We trade unity for uniformity. We trade cooperation for competition. We forget that rights are natural and inborn, granted by the Creator. We ignore ethics and morals.

The Declaration of Independence reminds us:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Top Hollywood celebrities transgender their children to mainstream the concept of the androgyne and eliminate the concept of gender. The deception of many decades that went under the radar is now coming out in unicorns and rainbows as the new normal.

What’s next? Crossing the species border with rights for animal-human hybrids? Are we willing to follow along and become part of an agenda that seeks to destroy us or do we turn it around, let go of the labels, and respect our sacred nature as human beings?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email