What if the 2020 pandemic is founded on propaganda, crime, and illegal patents?
David E. Martin says on his FB page: “The violation of Constitutional rights is unraveling and all of this based on lies from public health conspirators who have illegal restraint of trade conflicts.”
He says that Emergency powers cannot be invoked for a suspicion without clear and compelling evidence.
More importantly, David Martin has drafted a letter that outlines the evidence from his case of The People of the World against Anti-Trust and Unconstitutional actions taken by CDC, Dr. Fauci, several State Governors, and others.
Let’s begin with the numbers.
Glitch in Statistics
- Flu Illnesses—39 million to 56 million
- Flu medical visits 18 million to 26 million
- Flu hospitalizations 410 thousand to 740 thousand
- Flu deaths-24 thousand to 62 thousand
The most recent glitch in unreliable stats stems from a new medical policy to diagnose all deaths (including suicides) as a Covid-19 deaths. More importantly, the draconian measures of lock-downs and “social distancing” by state governors are illegal and criminal because they violate civil rights and freedoms. According to attorney David Martin:
To date, there is no clinical data showing that the restraint of healthy individuals, also known as “social distancing,” has any empirical data supporting its use… In no model, in no scientific document, in no place at all, has there ever been validation that quarantining a healthy population has any merit in science. Governor Newsom, followed by another 42 governors, decided unilaterally to take propaganda, rather than science and turn it into public policy. This direct violates the Constitutional protections of the United States. – David Martin (See the 19:00 minute mark)
The Case Against Dr. Facui, the CDC, Several State Governors
On April 25, 2003, Dr. Anthony Fauci (FAUX-ci), head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the CDC, filed a patent for “Coronavirus, isolated from humans,” along with the test kit for detecting SARS associated Coronavirus (SARS-Cov). The test kit comes with restrictions for anyone anywhere from using it.
Under 35 USC Section 101, the patenting of a substance of Nature (i.e., human cells) is illegal.
On February 17, 2014, the CDC utilized US tax dollars to renew their illegal patent, and thereby violated Section 1, Section 8 Clause 8 of the US Constitution (using public funds in light of the 2013 Supreme Court ruling).
Additionally, the test was not approved by the FDA for emergency use until February 4, 2020. However, in late January the CDC had allegedly conducted 210 tests on alleged cases of Coronavirus infection in the U.S. Therefore, the CDC had falsely reported information before any authorization was granted.
Since 2003, Fauci and the CDC have held an illegal patent on both the virus and on the test required to detect its presence. Because there is no way to independently verify this virus, this constitutes violations of the Sherman Act (AntiTrust). [The fox guarding the henhouse].
By renewing the illegal CDC patents, FAUX-ci, the CDC and NIAID, violated Article 1 Section 8 Clause 8. of the U.S. Constitution. They maintained an illegal monopoly, restrained trade, and violated both the Sherman Act (15 USC Section 1), and the Clayton Act of 1914, which includes the AntiTrust Acts, in their business practices with both domestic and foreign operators. Therefore, FAUX-ci, et al. are liable for both civil and criminal allegations.
For these violations and other willful engagements, and because these agencies had received further funding, FAUX-ci elected to suspend testing as a requirement to classify a patient with Covid-19. In the interim, CDC created a new ICD code where “assumption” could be used as an official cause of death due to Covid-19:
Should “COVID-19” be reported on the death certificate only with a confirmed test? COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc. If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.
Governor Emergency Orders Violate The Law
At the time of the first executive declaration by a governor to lock down a state, neither the CDC nor the WHO had sufficient testing in place to confirm or isolate the novel Coronavirus. California did not have pathology data to suggest that the epidemic was imminent, and the rest of the United States was incapable from making any such assessment because of the aforementioned actions of the conspiring parties. (See the 22-minute mark for details).
David Martin says:
In his Executive Order, Governor Newson of California issued the suspension of civil liberties under “the threat of Coronavirus’ without any confirmed serology or confirmed immunologic evidence. Therefore, he violated his rights under government code sections 8567, 8627, and 8655.
There is no Constitutional protection that has ever afforded a governor in any state the right to suspend civil liberties on the “threat” of a thing, especially without any confirmed serology or verifiable evidence or testing to identify the “novel Coronavirus,” with no pathology data. And in this particular case, could not be verified without infringing the CDC’s patent, or without their collusion. (See the 20:38 minute mark).
Mr. Martin submits that Dr Anthony Fauci, the CDC, and their co-conspiring governors have also violated of the Domestic Terrorism Provision under the Patriot Act, Section 802. Anyone who instituted a lockdown order prior to March 15, 2020, when the Patriot Act expired, did so in violation of this section of the Patriot Act. SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended–
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.’.
What Can You Do Within The Legal System?
To Whom It May Concern:
The Declaration of a State of Emergency and the ensuing lockdown – which exempts persons deemed “essential” without any basis in scientific fact or in Critical Infrastructure definition under the U.S. DHS – violates the legal standard set forth in Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900). Due to the facts outlined here: http://www.invertedalchemy.com/2020/04/covid-19-anti-trustargument.html
1. The Governor of (Virginia) could not have known that there was a virulent outbreak caused by a single pathogen (reportedly SARS CoV-2) when declaring the State of Emergency;
2. No scientific evidence has been offered justifying the declaration – mere reporting of mortality and morbidity based on pneumonia symptoms does not an epidemic or pandemic make;
3. The Governor failed to provide adequate testing to confirm or deny the presence or absence of “a novel coronavirus” and, based on recent reports from incarcerated persons, it would appear that positive tests COULD NOT have been based on community transmission as 96% of confined persons have tested positive according to Reuters; and,
4. No effort has been made by the Governor or regional health authorities to overturn the established science published in JAMA that facemasks should not be worn by healthy individuals (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694?fbclid=IwAR3fI10GKsPfg16ths4EK E6od7JrZT15U_CJ-OQJo96fMTbZWxuQDc_NGuU) and that social distancing that involves the confinement of healthy individuals has neither been tested nor validated with any science whatsoever.
I kindly request that you take this matter up on behalf of the Citizens of (Virginia).
When are we going to realize that testing for something that has not been measured does NOT a pandemic make? – David Martin